Charlize Theron currently has two movies out in theaters
simultaneously (her agent must be working hard) and both are desperately crying
out for a feminist review.
*Spoiler Alert
*Spoiler Alert
Snow White and the
Huntsman:
The fairy tale redux is the latest vogue in Hollywood and poor
Snow White has been remixed and redone twice in the past year. I didn’t see the
Julia Roberts and Nathan Lane adaptation, about which I heard unpleasant things
(I wonder though, can anything with the brilliant Nathan Lane ever be that
bad?), but the trailer looked promising, despite the presence of Kristin
Stewart.
I’m going to go off on a tangent here about Kristin Stewart:
really, Hollywood? You like Kristen Stewart that much that you’ve decided to continue
to feed her roles? Can’t you just admit that she’s a horrifically, terrible
actress? She has literally one expression she uses: surprised fear. I have
stuffed animals with a greater range of displayed emotion.
That tepid, surprised fear bleeds its unfortunate paralysis
into the rest of the film, which had an otherwise legitimately promising cast
and a script with some real potential. The film, and most notably Stewart,
fails to commit to anything. Is Snow White a herald of action hero bad-assery
intent on her destiny to kill the wicked witch? Or is she an angelic innocent
saint, so pure that her goodness can overcome the queen’s toxic,
kingdom-killing evil? Stewart definitely has no idea and so neither do the
characters who interact with her, making her role (the title one) the most
boring and confusing part of the film.
This leads into one of my main feminist concerns with the
film, the fact that Stewart’s Snow White is supposedly only powerful because of
her “innocence and purity.” Again we have to go back to ideas of innocence and
purity for women, without which, we can apparently accomplish nothing, nor be
of any value. This is, of course, in direct opposition to the male characters
in the film who are drunk, unethical and constantly killing something. This
kind of clichéd, stereotype reinforcing portrayal of the wounded, nasty, albeit
powerful warrior, who falls in love with the gentle, sweet maiden (always
pure), is without a doubt the most annoying thing ever.
In a supposedly “enlightened” society, why do we insist upon
returning to Victorian ideals of female purity and a demeaning “innocence”
(meaning lacking in life experience and child-like)? I am neither pure nor
innocent, yet I manage to hold my own in life and (hopefully) do some good.
However, that doesn’t mean that the film is wholly without
any redeeming qualities; the film has a strong focus on the evil queen and
gives her a powerful back-story, one that explains her obsession with youth and
beauty. The reason she’s so obsessed with beauty? It has been her only means of
gaining power and protecting herself from men. This plotline made a great
parallel to our own rich and famous and their fascination with cosmetic
surgery: in order to stay powerful and current, they must stay young and
beautiful or be eviscerated by the media and potentially lose their jobs.
The plotline can be taken even further though. Not only is
she conscripted into a life of damaging narcissism because of her beauty, but
other women are similarly used. Recognizing that their beauty is both their power
and their undoing, we meet a commune of women who have scarred their faces in
order to protect themselves from the queen, a plot line that reminded me of the
current situation in the Middle East where rules governing women and their
clothing have reached new heights. There, some people believe that women should
hide their tempting eyes as a way to save men from being forced to ravish them
in the streets.
Instead of exploring that plotline further however, the
filmmakers decided to move on to another nonsense scene of Stewart looking
scared and confused while running through a field.
However, the costume design was amazing, the sets inspiring,
the music beautiful (I can say with absolutely certainty that the new Florence
and the Machine song, Breath of Life, which was created for the film, is
awesome), and the cinematography inspiring.
Charlize Theron did a good job as the tortured queen and Sam
Spruell as her creepy brother was excellent; their relationship was one of the
best parts of the film in my mind. Chris Hemsworth was fairly bland, but nice
to look at, so I personally forgive him for being a bit boring.
All in all, the film was a gold mine of good-filmmaking and
feminist potential, but which came up short because of it’s inability to either
fully embrace its traditional fairy tale values or it’s modern ones.
Prometheus:
The prequel and spinoff for the classic film Alien has as much feminist food as it’s
precursor did, albeit slightly less groundbreaking, though we can’t fault it
for that: Alien did give us the first
female action hero in Sigourney Weavers portrayal of the irrepressible Ripley.
Prometheus is
naturally larger in scale and far more reliant on special effects, a feature
that while clichéd is expected in the current sci-fi action genre (not to be solely
negative, the landscape was absolutely amazing and the cinematography superb,
seriously, watch for some stunning views of Iceland’s Vatnajökull National Park,
Hekla Volcano, and Detifoss Waterfall).
And while some of the scenes are admittedly, far more
graphic and gratuitous than I think necessary (there is a simple purity to the
original Alien death scenes that I
think is lacking here), the film featured some thought provoking and disturbing
themes, though all backed again by a strong, smart, female scientist-turned-reluctant
heroine and survivor, similar to the original Ripley.
The Swedish Noomi Rapace (seriously loving these Swedish
actors) and South African Charlize Theron oppose each other brilliantly; Theron
as the efficient and disdainful corporate heavy, Noomi as the resistant,
believing, courageous scientist out to find some answers.
The film features a hefty score of themes for discussion,
including one of the most disturbing abortion scenes I’ve ever seen. That scene
is apparently what pushed the film up from a PG-13 rating into an R; if the
studio had wanted to ensure a PG-13 rating, the MPAA demanded that they cut the
entire scene. However, both Scott and Rapace felt the scene was pivotal in
Shaw’s intense desire to survive and in her emotional and mental development. If
you weren’t pro-choice before, chances are you might be after witnessing this
scene.
Perhaps notable as well is the fact that Shaw (Pascar’s
character who has the abortion) must physically fight to have one, forcing her
to face the ordeal entirely alone. After the operation we see a general disdain
for her decision (though perhaps a grudging respect for her will to
survive). What stunned me about
the whole situation was the entire lack of care and concern she received after
it happened, the whole horrific event was entirely passed over without even a
raised eyebrow in her direction as to her well being. She is even brutally hit
in the abdomen by an unfeeling thug, an action I felt very deliberate in its
exploitation of her recent scarring experience.
In a recent interview, Rapace discussed the scene, stating
that the four of days of shooting were the most stressful of the entire film
and that she started to have vicious nightmares of alien babies growing inside
of her. On a personal note, I can well imagine such nightmares: the fear of
losing control, of something taking you over without your will, of something
using your body as it’s own instrument, it’s a powerful message about the state
of the female body in our society and I found it profound and disconcerting.
Sexual imagery as well abounds in the film and, as has been
said of the other Alien films, there
is a substantial amount of phallic imagery and perhaps (we don’t want to
project too much here) the male fear of rape as many men are violently violated
and penetrated by a long, tubular, animal, which of course impregnates them.
An interesting theme that is present in this film, but not
the other Alien films is a profoundly
religious one, the death of our makers. On Prometheus
the death of a parent is the agent of destruction as each main character
deals with the abandonment and rejection they feel from their creation and of
course, their ensuring resentment towards that creator. Even the mission of the
ship is designed to find our own creators and discover why they have abandoned
us and why we were created in the first place, if we were just to be left to
our own devices. The title of the film then becomes remarkably fitting (as I’m
sure was intentional) since Prometheus was a Greek who stole fire from the Gods
to give to humans, an act that lead to the humans advancement and eventual
independence from their creators. Prometheus was brutally punished for his
disobedience and his compassion, destined to suffer for eternity, however that
doesn’t stop the continued progression of humanity.
Similarly in the film, the ship and its inhabitants are
obviously being punished for their own disobedience and for the overwhelming
intention to survive and protect themselves from their own creator’s rejection
and malevolence.
Even Michael Fassbender, who plays a Lawrence of Arabia fan
and a Peter O’Toole lookalike, states, “We all want our parents dead,”
indicating that even he, as a robot is unsatisfied with his creator’s image. In
a odd twitch the themes of creation and destruction then becomes mutually
inclusive and creation becomes more of an act of ability rather than an act of
love. Why do we make something? “Because we could.”
Although disturbing, I found the religious and social themes
to be thought provoking and feminist-friendly and I would easily recommend the
film. Though I did cover my eyes like a small child during a few of the more
intense jump scenes.
What did you think of Prometheus
and Snow White and the Huntsman?
The only thing I'd disagree with is the assessment of Prometheus as a feminist film. In my opinion, Scott didn't push far enough in the direction of gender discomfort to do that. I can see that he was inching there for the reasons you mentioned, but I thought he bowed out of an extremely good opportunity to really push our buttons by making the pregnancy scene traditionally female. The males in the movie who were infected with the alien seemed merely to be infected--though, admittedly, in a visually disturbing way--, whereas Shaw's character was truly impregnated. To have had a man incubating an alien species in his body and then to abort it surgically--that's what I was looking for. Plus, at the end of the film, I couldn't help wondering what Scott has against vaginas, a question I asked my brother-in-law today when we discussed the movie. He laughed because he had wondered the same thing. Anyways, yes, Shaw's character was strong and her strength in that scene was amazing, so it added a lot to her character. But I think representing the male body as an incubator would have been a bolder move.--Cherise
ReplyDeleteBitch Flicks has a really interesting reading of Prometheus as it relates to abortion, for readers who are interested in that topic specifically.
ReplyDelete